在國外知名論壇Quora上，一名印度網友問道：名列財富世界五百強榜單的企業中，有許多企業管理者是印度人，為什麼中國人無法複製他們的成功？一名社會學家感到可笑又莫名其妙，針對這一現象回答了他的問題。
問題：許多印度人成為財富世界五百強的CEO，為什麼像中國人他們不能複製印度人的成功？
Probably this question should be changed into :“why many indians choose to become CEOs of American F500 companies。”
我覺得這個問題應該改為“為什麼這麼多印度人才選擇成為美國五百強公司的CEO而非回國效力？”
There are 115 Chinese companies，51 Japanese companies and 15 Korean companies in Fortune Global 500. Their CEOs are all Chinese，Japanese，and korean. Over a fifth of the CEOs are Chinese, and a third of the CEOs come from East Asia.
給你看一組資料，2021年《財富》世界500強中有115家中國公司、51家日本公司和15家韓國公司。他們各自的執行長都是本國人。在這個榜單中，有超過五分之一的執行長是中國人，三分之一的執行長來自東亞。
So I guess you are mainly concerned in American Companies, That’s Probably because only 7 Indian companies are listed in F500. almost nothing for the Indian CEOs working for.
所以我猜你所指的印度裔CEO是美國公司的，畢竟印度公司只有7家上榜。
So here is a question you shall ask instead. why do the great Indian CEOs have to work for the United States? Why aren’t the other Asian countries replicate this failure of the Indian Nation?
在瞭解這些之後，你應該問問自己，為什麼這麼多印度人才偏偏要為美國工作？為什麼其他亞洲國家不像印度一樣為美國輸送人才？
In Japan, it’s a proud to work for Japanese stockholders, In China,It’s a shame to work for foreign stockholders.
我告訴你答案，因為在日本，為日本股東工作是一種驕傲，在中國，為外國資本背書是一種恥辱。
However here, you considered Indians’s working for foreign companies a success.If they start a business or are the leaders of an industry, it is understandable, and we should be proud of him, but the CEO in your mouth only serves foreign capital and is essentially an employment relationship.
然而，很可悲的是，你卻認為為外國公司工作是一種成功。如果他們開創了一家企業或者是某個行業的領軍人物那也情有可原，尚且值得我們為他驕傲，但你口中的CEO，他們只是為外國資本服務的，本質上是僱傭關係。
And I have to tell you, This view’s popularity in India is just the reason why the Indian enterprises fail.
現在你還認為印度人才為歐美國家的企業效力值得印度驕傲嗎？而且說實話，持有這種觀念正是印度企業做不起來的原因。
Chinese are mostly concerned to provide employement in their own country rather than serving in developed nations as a CEO which cannot attribute much in curbing unemployment in their own country.They will focus on whether they can let Chinese products go abroad and promote the development of their own economy.
中國的民族企業家關心的是能否為這個國家提供就業機會，能不能讓中國的產品走出國門，能不能推動本國經濟的發展。
Real strength of country depends on what its national achieve in their own country rather than counting 90–100 people success as national pride.
因此，一個國家的真正實力取決於這個民族在本國土地上取得的發展成就，而不應該靠幾個人在別的國家取得一定地位來增強民族自豪感。
Indians have a slave mentality. Since time immemorial we have been enslaved, first by the Islamic rulers, and then by the Britishers, now it is the American tech giants. They love being slaves. They love working for American companies, because they don’t want to risk it, they play it safe, so instead of innovating, instead of creating anything new, they get settled for foreign companies, they start toiling for their American masters.
印度人有嚴重的奴隸心理。從遠古時代起，我們就被奴役，先是被伊斯蘭統治者奴役，然後是被英國人奴役，現在被美國科技與資本巨頭奴役。他們喜歡做奴隸，寧願為美國公司賣命工作，也不想冒風險創業，他們謹慎行事，並因此沒有創新精神，難以創造任何新的東西，他們漸漸適應了外國公司的運作模式，心甘情願的為他們的美國主人努力工作。
We might as well make a comparison. On the one hand, we send talents to Europe and the United States and work for them, while our country has not received any development dividends; On the other hand, relying on its innovation and originality, China has cultivated a large number of talents and created many influential enterprises, such as Huawei, Alibaba, Xiaomi and so on.
不妨做個對比，一方面，我們為歐美輸送人才，為他們效力，而我們本國沒得到一點發展的紅利；另一方面，中國依靠其具有創新性和獨創性，培養了大量人才，建立了諸多有影響力的企業，例如華為、阿里、小米等等。
Which of these is better for one’s country?, I ask you.
現在，我問你，哪一個模式對國家更有利呢？
